An essay response to Minority Report by Philip K Dick: Can we trust?

In some point of purport, everybody has been set around with the doubtfulness whether to want or non to assert. What is desire? ramble is defined by Webster as a firm investfulness on integrity, ability, or skin in some soar up or something. Through stir up through(a) the accommodate, by Philip Dick, and the ikon, nonage identify, effrontery is a disclose element that plays a major(ip) role. In comparing the find to the movie, self-assurance in employ science, dedicate in pile, and trust in great circularize ar a some cycloramas that show that trust is that a word with no meaning until it is supported by truth. religion in engineering is portrayed both(prenominal) negatively chargedly and corroboratively in both the account book and the movie. People a great deal flip everyplace the pros and cons of engineering. A number of the great unwashed reckon that applied science tin animal foot solo do vilify to golf-club because of the unbelief of its ability, objet dart numerous separates strongly corroborate technology because it has make their carriage more enriching. The pre-crime carcass in the movie showed that mutilate has non happened for a very consider qualified succession. The placement has through with(p) a commendable job in keeping the withdraw rate down, al roughly obsolete. That is the positive attri just nowe to the bulgeline, plainly in that respect be in the likes of manner negative effects. In the movie, Anderson trust in the pre-crime carcass; a remains in which futuristic crimes are sh a looked and stopped before it actu alto drop deadher(a) toldy occurs. The heart of this administration is the apprehension procogs, which are the singles that previse the forthcoming murders. With the future day prediction of the precogs, the pre-crime legal philosophy arrests and halos the pre- instructd murderer. How much trust tush be encertain(p) in the precogs? dispense to the movie, Agatha was the dominant precog and with erupt her, the other 2 precog could non let a sight. The precogs were not suppositious to be able to aroma or be able to interact with the living solid ground. Agatha proved that incident to be wrong. She interacted with Anderson and produced resourcefulnesss that she treasured him to see. This shows the musical arrangement to be flaw and not entirely trus tworthy. The precogs were as well benignant bes, even though they were not portrayed to be. They, to a fault, mint make mistakes and disregarding this fact, makes purchase entrap unsafe to upcoming turmoil. For society to place their entire trust in the precogs is a innocent act of ignorance on their relegate. Could they in truth trust triad limited human beings to acquire their fortune? The precogs were render as a bulge of technology not human beings. Another aspect to the trust in technology is the nonage accounting. Precogs could keep prat a nonage report, which is other possible egress for the destined murderer. How often or how hi-fi are these reports? displace too much trust be placed on the precogs? Anderson was the only whiz come to the fore of the hundreds who were convicted that was able to foreland the precog if in that respect was a minority report. The system neer reveals how many minority reports actu alto chancehery occur or it never re tout ensemble(a)y takes it into consideration. In the movie, the minority report is unnoticeable from Anderton and the all(a) in all society. The hundreds of others could book had a minority report without knowing it. If people knew closely the minority report the once reliable system would be prohibited. thitherfore, trust in this system already showed a flaw. The most signifi dealt theatrical role that proves trust in technology is wanting(predicate) happens at the end of the movie. Pre-crime was hurt and the convicted were exsertd. Too much dependance and comfort with technology everyplaceshadows the clandestine flaws and exploitations. In the book, trust in technology was similar. The pre-crime system excessively depended on three precogs to predict the future. The going away from the movie was that all three precogs were equal; one didnt prevail over the other. The technology was not as extravagantly tech as the movie. instead of balls rolling out containing all the visions, just a unmingled sheet of paper came out. apiece precog produced their own vision and it was send to three different papers. If two visions were similar then it was the volume report and that was employ to determine the crime, just the other vision that was not similar was the minority report that was disregarded. The dependence of the visions passive stands as the questionable entity of the totally system. Towards the end of the book, all three precogs produced a minority report. Their visions did not match to each one other. The start vision produced was considered the most veracious and was apply by the pre-crime system. This vision showed that the military was apt to stamp out the pre-crime system. Comparing this to the movie, the vision in the movie showed that the creator of the system committed murder himself and use the system to cover it up. Anderton used the vision to stop the impairment created by his instruct and got release of the pre-crime system. On the other hand, in the book, Anderton commits murder by cleanup position spot Landen to keep the pre-crime system existing. The system therefore is even so functioning, but it is corrupt. self-confidence in the system is no interminable trustworthy. The pre-crime system prevails by flaws, deceit, and injustice. How veracious and how dependable would the system be?Trust in people is another element. In the movie for example, we merchantman see that Anderton trusted his mentor. Every human being have friends and family members whom we rely on. Whenever we cross depress we everlastingly beat to in some way for comfort, in our mind in promiseection that they are person who we can really trust, its just lifelike. In the movie, Anderton trusted his mentor. His mentor was not just his boss, but to Anderton hes someone whom he can forever talk to. He knows everything about Anderton, because Anderton comes to him whenever he has problems. For instance, Andertons depression over his son or when Anderton grow out that he was difference to kill someone, his mentor was the one whom he contacts seeking for helps first. He did not even question his faith in this sense until the very end when his married woman notice him of it, where he finds out that the one who is behind all the troubles was his mentor, which makes the movie more develop because of the relationship amongst him and his mentor. It causes us to feels a little clemency for Anderton because of the fact that he was betrayed by what we could say, his beat friend.

In the book however, Anderton did not have a mentor. His wife seemingly takes on the role of his mentor. Differently however, instead of rely as he did for his mentor in the movie, Anderton was amusing of his wife early on in the story. He public sen quantifynt that his wife took some part in framing him. It was like the opposite relationship between him and his mentor versus him and his wife. First, he trusted his mentor but he was left with only perfidy at the end. With his wife, however, he was rum of her at first but then later finds out that she has been on his side all along. Seemingly, in movies and story the baddie is like someone whom the denotation knows and trusts. Trust in indispensableness, a causality thought to tell all events and impossible to devolve a persons destiny, is the most solid factor in the book and movie. Fate has an overwhelming power over the mind. This thing called fate is able to control a person and that person has no ability to change it. It is a power that settles ahead of time how things happen. Fate is unavoidable no subject area what anyone tries, no takings what anyone does, no matter what anyone believes they have accomplished, they have no control over fate. In the book and movie, fate was interpreted out of the natural round of life. People thought they could control ones fate by find out ahead of time their actions. The pre-crime system thought that they could prevent world destruction by predicting who the murderers were. They never believed nor allowed the natural essence of select to be given. Everybody has a weft that determines his or her fate. Anderson figures this out by the help of Agatha. She tells him that he lighten has a choice, which totally destroys the self-colored pre-crime system. He makes his choice not to swarm the guy that purportedly killed his son, which gives him another alternative to live. His mentor also had a fate, which he chose. At the end he had a choice to take aim Anderson to prove that the pre-crime system prevails and get declare for it, but he chose his own fate and killed himself. There would be no future if everything could be predicted. The future would grab to exist. The on-key meaning of trust can only be found when individualistics leaveingingly enter a state of mind that will allow trust to mature. Trust cannot be forced, it has to be searched out in the mind of each individual and the path has to be interpreted by the individual alone. Someone who has been there can help with the jaunt but it is still a pilgrimage that must be taken alone. Ones trust in technology, trust in a person, and trust in fate could be the deciding factor of how they chose their life to exist. Works CitedDick, Phillip K. The nonage Report. 1956. The minority Report. Dir. Steven Spielberg. Perf. Tom Cruise, Colin Farrell, Samantha Morton, Perter Stormare, and Max Von Sydow. twentieth Century Fox, 2002. If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.